![]() ![]() ![]() I thought the Casino had a lot more growl and punch in the mids, but also more highs and just seemed more bright and lively, while the AS-73 just seemed more subdued and jazzy.īut these are very small sample sizes, so take these observations with a dose of salt.įinally, I'll add that if you like the Beatles or Elliott Smith's live tone, the Casino might be a good choice. That said, I still preferred the basic sound over the AS-73, which sounded rather dull to me, even with nice aftermarket pickups. They were both solid guitars, but the Casino definitely has more, erm, "personality" if you know what I mean? The bridge was rattly, the tuning wasn't the most stable, and the pickups had a big difference in volume, and the bass pickup could get boomy. I had an AS-73 and a Casino, not at the same time. It is semi-hollow and has humbuckers, not P-90s. ![]() Well the AM93 seems more like an ES-335 than a Casino (or the Gibson ES-330 which is nearly identical to the Casino). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |